Question 59

XL-RMCQ2 marksNeeds review
Consider the following four experimental observations (i, ii, iii, iv) on the effect of the FT gene on flowering transition in the shoot apical meristem (SAM) of Arabidopsis thaliana.
i) The FT promoter is active in leaves alone.
ii) The ft null mutation causes delayed flowering transition of the SAM.
iii) Expressing a recombinant FT protein fused to nuclear localization signal sequence under the endogenous promoter does not rescue the delayed-flowering phenotype of the ft null mutant.
iv) Downregulation of FT transcript in the SAM by RNA interference in the wild-type background does not alter flowering transition.
Which one of the following conclusions best explains the above observations?
Your answerChoose one option.

Log in to check the answer

You can attempt this question now. Sign in to view the answer key, explanations and discussion.Log in to check answer

EXPLORE & PRACTISE

Paper and topic context

See where this question comes from and choose what to practise next.

2023XL-R

GATE XL 2023 · Paper 1

Life Sciences · Original paper archive

Section
Section XL-R
Question type
Multiple choice (MCQ)
Marks
2 marks

Practise related topics

Explore more previous year questions using this question’s imported topic tags.

life sciences

GATE XL previous year questions

biology

GATE XL previous year questions

biological sciences

GATE XL previous year questions

Plant development; cell and tissue morphogenesis

GATE XL previous year questions

Comments

Ask a question, share your approach, or help someone understand.

Log in to view the discussion

You’re not logged in. Log in or create an account to see discussions and add comments.